Hans · Audit Preparer
Quality · Custom implementation
Automate audit preparation with AI
Collects the evidence an audit asks for, flags what is missing and keeps track of the actions.
Connects toBefore an audit, most of the time goes on searching for evidence that already exists. And complaints get resolved but are rarely logged in full, so nobody sees what keeps going wrong.
An AI employee for quality keeps track all year of which evidence belongs to which requirement and logs complaints so they can be counted. The audit, the judgement on a control and the cause of a complaint stay with your quality manager.
Hans · Audit Preparer
Quality · Custom implementation
Collects the evidence an audit asks for, flags what is missing and keeps track of the actions.
Connects toEva · Complaints Registrar
Quality · Example application
Records complaints and incidents in full, monitors how they are handled and makes patterns visible.
Connects toThese AI employees sit with another department, but touch the same work.
This is the starting point for each task. Exactly where the line sits for your team, we agree together during setup.
Runs automaticallyLinks evidence to standard requirements, flags gaps and outdated documents and assigns actions to the process owner.
A person decidesThe audit itself, and the judgement on whether a control works.
Runs automaticallyRecognises complaints, logs them in full and tracks the handling deadline.
A person decidesEstablishing the cause and resolving the complaint. It only suggests a category.
You stay in control.
Not every decision should be made automatically. For each workflow, we set out:
The AI employees on this page work with these packages, among others. Is your system not listed? We can connect any system, even if there is no standard integration.
With preparation and upkeep: linking evidence to each requirement, flagging outdated documents and records that have stopped, and assigning actions to the process owner. The audit itself and the judgement on whether a control works stay with your auditor and quality manager.
Once it has been set up, yes. We make that link together with your quality manager, because it differs per organisation. A standard mapping would give false certainty.
Yes, from tone and content. Many complaints start as a question or a remark and are never logged. The Complaints Registrar records them, suggests a category and tracks the handling deadline. Establishing the cause is expert work and stays with a person.
Yes. That is often the same evidence in a different format, and that is exactly where a lot of duplicate work goes.
No. Documents stay in SharePoint or OneDrive, records in Jira or your own database and complaints in your ticketing system. The AI employee makes the connections; no second archive is added.