The clockwork of your company
What one process really costs you, and where the threshold lies above which fixing it pays
Free · calculation model · 12 pagesTwo weeks of measuring, half an hour of calculating
You have worked out one process in your company to an amount per year, and you know whether it sits above or below the threshold where intervening pays for itself.
The document is in Dutch.
Why you won't find this anywhere else
Everyone says “measure your processes”. Nobody says how to do that without a time-tracking project that costs more than it delivers. The trick in this model is that you don't count hours but handovers. They can be counted without bothering anyone, and they predict cost better than hours, because the cost sits in waiting time and rework, not in the task itself.
What's inside
- The six-column measurement model, filled in from traces that already exist: mailbox, system, calendar
- A fourteen-day measuring plan in which nobody has to record anything extra
- The calculation from counts to an amount per year, with lead time as a separate item
- The threshold above which intervening pays, and the zone below it where you should leave it alone
- The three processes that come out above the threshold in almost every company, and why that is structural
Who it's for
- Owners and management teams who work harder without more being left over
- Anyone who wants to know whether automating pays before starting
- Every industry: the model isn't sector-specific
Not for anyone who already has a process analysis with numbers. Then the question is which opportunity first, and that is a different model.
What this document doesn't solve
You have worked out one process. With five processes above the threshold, the question is which first, and that is a different trade-off from the sum.
That's what the AI Opportunity Audit is for: we map your processes, show where AI and automation deliver the most, and set out what to do first.
See the AI Opportunity Audit